The Verkhovna Rada has banned wearing masks, helmets or camouflage clothing by people taking part in a gathering, assembly, demonstration, protest, rally or other mass event.
According to chairperson of the accounting commission Volodymyr Oliinyk of the Party of Regions faction, respective draft law No. 3879 was backed by 235 or minimum required 226 deputies.
In compliance with the endorsed law, use of the said articles during mass events would be fined 150-250 tax-exempt minimum personal incomes or an administrative arrest for the period of up to 15 days.
The same responsibility is applied in case of use of open fire, fireworks (lighting, signaling, imitation), weapons and special means of self-defense charged with substances of tear and irritant action, explosives or flammable substances, objects specially adapted or prepared in advance to commit unlawful acts.
Participation in the said events less respective permits of interior affairs bodies wearing uniform resembling uniform of militiamen or military men also entail the abovesaid punishment.
Besides, the law envisions that installation of tents or other small architectural shapes, objects or structures used as a stage, sound equipment for or during public events without the permission of the militia entail a fine ranging from 250 to 500 tax-exempt minimum personal incomes, or administrative arrest for up to 15 days.
Please contact the Marketing and Sales Department and subscribe to receive the full version of the news article:
See artice writer mark williams's online websites on Camouflage http://placidwaif402.snappages.comand http://www.getjealous.com/childlikenurse454
BELGOROD, Russia ? On the outskirts of this sleepy city bordering Ukraine, residents were surprised Thursday when a military helicopter lifted off into the dreary sky.
?Look! They brought out the real machines today,? said Viktor Naumov, 28, a courier, who pulled his car over to the shoulder of an adjacent highway to give a shout of appreciation.
The helicopter was one of the few visible signs here of what Western governments, including the United States, say is a muster of tens of thousands of troops deployed by the Kremlin that could preface an invasion of Ukraine, a step that President Vladimir V. Putin has said he might employ to protect Russian-speakers in the country?s east.
Continue reading the main story Related Coverage But in and around Belgorod, which sits a scant 40 miles from Kharkiv, Ukraine?s second-largest city and a likely target in case of an invasion, any increased military presence is largely kept out of the public eye. In a region that appears far from being on the brink of war, life continues as normal here, and many residents say they do not want war, dismissing reports of a buildup as rumors set to discredit Russia.
?It may simply be an effort to intimidate Ukraine or it may be that they?ve got additional plans,? Mr. Obama said in the interview.
Residents here are not so convinced. ?Show me the tanks first, show me anything here that proves all this, and then we can talk about an invasion,? said Pyotr Kudryavtsev, a retiree walking away from the tracks near the Vesyolaya Lopan station south of Belgorod, where scores of military vehicles were filmed being unloaded on March 12. Mr. Kudryavtsev, like other locals interviewed, denied this, saying that the heavy tracks in the mud close to the rails belonged to construction vehicles.
Those weapons of war have now seemingly dispersed, either onto nearby bases or, as some have alleged, into tightly guarded hiding places along the border, ready to strike.
Despite a strong dislike for the interim government in Kiev, most residents of Belgorod and the surrounding towns and villages rejected the idea of any kind of attack against their neighbor.
?At all costs we must avoid war,? said Aleksandr Strelkov, a mechanic, who was visiting the Museum of the Battle of Kursk in downtown Belgorod with his 7-year-old son.
Mr. Strelkov stood in front of a 50-foot-tall, larger-than-life diorama of the Battle of Kursk, featuring plumes of smoke from burning tanks and scores of soldiers engaged in hand-to-hand combat. The 1943 battle between Soviet and German forces is considered one of the largest tank battles in history.
Patriotism and a hallowed respect for those killed in World War II run especially strong in Belgorod, which bills itself as the City of the First Salute, after a salvo of fireworks in Moscow was dedicated to the city after its liberation from Nazi forces in 1943.
But today the voices of those in Russia who live closest to Ukraine are far less bellicose than leaders in Russia and in the West. ?Everyone has got an aunt, a cousin, or some relative in Ukraine,? Mr. Strelkov said. ?My wife is Ukrainian. How could we go to war with ourselves??
On the stretch of four-lane highway leading from Belgorod to the border, where a warm patch of spring has brought farmers out to cultivate their fields and trees into bloom, there are signs of heightened precautions.
Border guards, formerly unarmed, now stand with Kalashnikovs. A checkpoint had been bolstered to a six-man patrol and officers often inspect cars with Ukrainian plates.
Yet at least overtly, the military presence is invisible. Rather than waiting tensely for the first shots to ring out, most residents see a slow cooling and cross-border trips becoming more infrequent.
Valery Perfilyev, a taxi driver who regularly ferried Russians across the border to shop in Kharkiv, an industrial hub, and young men visiting the nightclubs and, occasionally, brothels of the city, said that traffic had slowed to a trickle since the ouster of President Viktor F. Yanukovych last month.
?We were the oxygen,? he said, referring to the money that entered Ukraine through Russia. ?Now it is like that has been cut off. They need us as much as we need them.?
At the stations along the railroad that leads from the city to Kharkiv, administrators declined to discuss troop movements or confirm recent videos that showed a column tanks and other military vehicles purportedly being unloaded at a railway stop 10 miles from the border.
A representative of the Ministry of Defense also refused to comment on troop movements.
As the clouds dispersed and the afternoon sun warmed Belgorod?s wide boulevards on Thursday, locals flocked to the promenade on Narodny Boulevard in central Belgorod.
A visual survey of the continuing dispute, including satellite images of Russian naval positions and maps showing political, cultural and economic factors in the crisis.
Many discussed politics, especially fears of growing nationalism in Kiev and reports of widespread lawlessness in eastern Ukraine that have dominated the Russian news media lately.
But would Russia make the next move?
?What will Putin do?? asked Anastasia Yefremova, who wore sunglasses and a lightweight sweater as she sat with friends. ?I suppose he will do the right thing, he will protect us. But he will not attack.?
On the train from Belgorod across the border to Kharkiv, many passengers were Ukrainians returning from Russia laden with goods as men drank beer and exchanged Russian rubles for Ukrainian hryvnia with money-changers roving the cars.
A border official, Aleksei Filiptsov, took extra care as he photographed a journalist?s documents, asking questions about his journey.
?If you fly from Sheremetyevo to Ukraine, these kinds of things don?t happen,? he said, referring to Moscow?s largest airport. ?But lately we?ve had a lot of unstable people around now. Many more than usual.? He declined to elaborate.
A man carrying a Ukrainian passport who gave his name as Aleksei, 37, was carrying four black bags filled with bottles of oil that he would sell in Kharkiv.
?We?re doing what we always do, just the same as before,? he said, as he watched tensely as first Russian border officials checked passports for those exiting the country, and later Ukrainian border police officers walked through the car, paying special attention to Russian arrivals, particularly young men.
As the checks ended and the doors to the train swung open, he gave a happy thumbs up.
?Praise be to God, things won?t get any worse,? he said, exiting the train, now in Ukraine.
Why ArenÃ¢Â¤Â™t Ã¢Â¤Â½Made in U.S.AÃ¢Â¤Â labels on US Troops Sneakers? | Beyond The Headline - Yahoo News
The federal government mandates that clothing for the nation"s armed service members be made in United States. With one exception, the military can import items that U.S. manufacturers don"t have the capability to produce. And apparently, that means sneakers. Under a 2002 exemption from the Berry Amendment, recruits are allowed to select their own athletic footwear based on comfort and fit, thereby reducing the potential for injuries related to their sneakers.
Now some American shoe makers, like New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc. are telling United States Department of Defense that they can produce a product for the military that is 100% "made in the U.S.A."
ABC"s David Muir met with Danielle Terry an employee at New Balance in New York City to see how they produce shoes with the "made in the U.S.A." in their "sneaker lab".
Danielle Terry unpacks a kit of unfinished shoe parts, produced in a factory in Maine, ready to be assembled in the sneaker lab. As she steams the leather and fits it over a form to make final adjustments and fasten the button lace, she explains that the final step is a something most costumers will never even notice.
"This is the last step of the whole assembly process," she says as she takes a UV marker and delicately writes on the sneaker. "The customer will never know that I wrote this, but here"s the little message on the shoe -- made in America."
Those three words, "made in America" seem to be a large draw for costumers looking to purchase sneakers made in the United States. "At least 50% of our customers only want made in America shoes," says Terry.
When asked what it would mean to her if New Balance received a contract with the Department of Defense to provide shoes for the US troops, she responds, "It"s honorable to know that we"re making sure that their feet are being protected. Our shoes are comfortable."
Looking at other districts in other states, Mike McIntyre's in NC went 39.9% Obama in 2012 and he retired because he didn't think he could win it again. Nick Rahall's in WV went 42.3% Obama in 2008 but only 32.8% Obama in 2012, and he's in the fight of his life this year. Jim Matheson's went 40.9% Obama in 2008 but only 30.2% Obama in 2012, and he retired.
Looking at the context, it looks like it's in the range where Democrats just don't win those districts anymore. I think we could beat Broun statewide, but if we can't, we certainly couldn't beat him in a district that looks almost 10 points more Republican than the state of Georgia.